After the shameful passing of one of the largest pork projects this country has ever seen, in the Transportation Bill last month, I thought nothing could surprise me in this country's elected leaders' desires to throw money around. I was wrong. The government response to the Katrina disaster has given them the urge to, once again, throw our money around like drunken sailors.
Never mind the fact that Alaska's Rep. Don Young, chairman of the House Transportation Committee, has bragged that the bill is "stuffed like a turkey" with goodies for his state, and that it includes $721 million for Alaska, including a $2.2 million "bridgeto nowhere" connecting the town of Kethikan (Pop. 8900) to an airport on Gravina Island (pop. 50) but another bridge in Anchorage has a $200 million price tag and is considered such a marginal project that even the Anchorage Chamber of Commerce opposes it. All this while we suffer from a slowing economy, have cut taxes and are fighting a war in Iraq and across the middle east.
Now, however the government, in its infinite wisdom, has decided to help the poor of NOLA and the other affected areas with an infusion of $62 billion (with a "b") to start and promises of another $100 to 200 billion or so later on. With no idea, yet what the real damages are or what the money is needed for, these prize pork rearers are already sending this money down the black hole of corruption and malfeasance. Just to show that they care. With your money.
We now know that the media frenzy and the finger-pointing local and state officals in New Orleans and Lousiana have aided in blowing this very real tragedy as far out of proportion as possible. Suggestions last week by Mayor Nagin that the deaths would probably number nearly 10, 000 have been tempered by the actual count today of less than 200! Meanwhile, rather than wait to accurately assess the REAL damage, our elected officials have pledged more money than many national GDPs to assuage the guilt that MIGHT be foisted upon them by political pundits and race-hustlers in the coming weeks and months (and to assure them that they deserve to be re-elected!).
The costs of government need to be cut. This means cutting programs and employees and salaries and aid to everyone, until we get our financial house in order. I know one thing. I wouldn't want to give a blank check-and that is what is being given to the local governments of this region-to a group that has proven that they can't even balance a checkbook.
As one political pundit has written(John Fund On the Trail, OpinionJournal.com, 9/12/2005) "what has happened to the Republican wing of the Republican Party"?
Go to the following link and tell congress not to throw your money wastefully at even more pork projects in the name of "Katrina Relief". The site is that of Citizens Against Government Waste. Click on "Help Keep Pork out of Hurricane Relief" and then click on "Action Alert". Then sign the petition. It's that simple!
http://cagw.org
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Beerme,
Nothing to say, just hand claps and wahues! Cripe why do I work? Just to generate tax dollars to be "reallocated by the superior intellect"???!!!!???
Libby Gone,
Ya know when the libs were bad mouthing the first and second Bush tax cuts-something I was very supportive of-I told them that it would mean the government would be starved and would, by necessity, get leaner. Boy do I feel stupid!
Mmmm...pork! Where's mine?
Kajun,
At least they could oil it to keep the dust down...
Don't get me wrong... I'm not in favor of throwing money down a toilet or anything, but let's put this in perspective a bit.
We gave almost $20 billion to Iraq to rebuild their infrastructure... is $60 billion spent in the U.S. a bad thing?
FEMA estimates that the daily costs of emergency response are right now around $2 billion per DAY! So at that rate, $62 billion will only get us through the first month of 31 days!
Hawkeye,
Yep, one month! That's about right...
Hawkeye,
Of course it is for a good cause. I agree with that. It's just that, like any government operation, there will be graft, corruption, mismanagement and malfeasance. What would it hurt to take a good look at what was broken, what didn't work the way it should have, what might have been done better, and after an exhaustive account of the problem and a full evaluation of the best way to fix it, THEN start applying the appropriate amounts of cash to get it done? Why start out by throwing money at the problem willy nilly, before we even know what needs to be done?
That's all's I'm sayin'...
Post a Comment